<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Browser Design Critic</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.onpaws.com/2005/09/design-critic/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.onpaws.com/2005/09/design-critic/</link>
	<description>traveling at the speed of life</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 10 Jul 2010 09:01:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: paws</title>
		<link>http://www.onpaws.com/2005/09/design-critic/comment-page-1/#comment-113</link>
		<dc:creator>paws</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Sep 2005 17:20:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onpaws.com/blog/?p=60#comment-113</guid>
		<description>I assume &#039;toolbar config&#039; means the button/text field layout. In which case I gladly stand corrected. Props to the Firefox team, that minimal toolbar layout is definitely superior to the 15 odd buttons on IE6&#039;s toolbar, especially where installing Office adds a new button.

It appears Apple got the &lt;a href=&quot;http://extensionroom.mozdev.org/clav/#fusion&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;integrated load bar&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a&gt;stop/reload button&lt;/a&gt; first. But hey, Firefox has it too now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I assume &#8216;toolbar config&#8217; means the button/text field layout. In which case I gladly stand corrected. Props to the Firefox team, that minimal toolbar layout is definitely superior to the 15 odd buttons on IE6&#8242;s toolbar, especially where installing Office adds a new button.</p>
<p>It appears Apple got the <a href="http://extensionroom.mozdev.org/clav/#fusion" rel="nofollow">integrated load bar</a> and <a>stop/reload button</a> first. But hey, Firefox has it too now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Asa Dotzler</title>
		<link>http://www.onpaws.com/2005/09/design-critic/comment-page-1/#comment-112</link>
		<dc:creator>Asa Dotzler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Sep 2005 23:40:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onpaws.com/blog/?p=60#comment-112</guid>
		<description>Actually, we had that toolbar config in Firefox long before Safari even existed. 

- A</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, we had that toolbar config in Firefox long before Safari even existed. </p>
<p>- A</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: paws</title>
		<link>http://www.onpaws.com/2005/09/design-critic/comment-page-1/#comment-111</link>
		<dc:creator>paws</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Sep 2005 20:19:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onpaws.com/blog/?p=60#comment-111</guid>
		<description>While I can&#039;t say I&#039;ve had that experience, a static blue underlay would definitely be confusing. The whole point of a load bar is the animation. 

I still give Apple props for design minimalism though; the more room there is for web content the better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While I can&#8217;t say I&#8217;ve had that experience, a static blue underlay would definitely be confusing. The whole point of a load bar is the animation. </p>
<p>I still give Apple props for design minimalism though; the more room there is for web content the better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brock</title>
		<link>http://www.onpaws.com/2005/09/design-critic/comment-page-1/#comment-110</link>
		<dc:creator>Brock</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Sep 2005 01:14:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.onpaws.com/blog/?p=60#comment-110</guid>
		<description>I think that the Safari progress bar is worse.  If the page load hangs or the user isn&#039;t accustomed to it, they may think part of the text is selected.  This wouldn&#039;t cause the slightest bit of strife with people like you and me, but most people using the Internet aren&#039;t like us.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that the Safari progress bar is worse.  If the page load hangs or the user isn&#8217;t accustomed to it, they may think part of the text is selected.  This wouldn&#8217;t cause the slightest bit of strife with people like you and me, but most people using the Internet aren&#8217;t like us.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
